Head to squarespace.com/arthurr to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code “arthurr”
BUY THE 16-55 HERE:
M Y G E A R :
Cameras –
📷 FAVORITE CAMERA:
📷 BACKUP CAMERA:
📷 ACTION CAMERA:
📷 BEST FULL FRAME FOR THE $$$:
Lenses –
❤️ MY #1 MOST RECOMMENDED LENS:
❤️ MY FAVORITE PORTRAIT LENS:
❤️ MY FAVORITE WALK AROUND LENS:
❤️ MY FAVORITE WIDE ANGLE LENS:
❤️ MY FAVORITE *CHEAP* LENS:
Accessories –
🔋🔋 CAMERA BATTERIES:
🎤 AUDIO RECORDER:
🎤 LAV MIC:
⚙️ BEST CHEAP TRIPOD:
⚙️ SMOOTHEST GIMBAL I’VE USED:
⚙️ SD CARD:
🛒 SHOPPING ON AMAZON? Use this link to support the channel [FOR FREE!]:
🌍 OUTSIDE OF THE US? USE THIS LINK: [Amazon]
🎦 MY E-MOUNT PAGE (updated weekly):
👧🏼 MY WIFE’S YOUTUBE:
🖼️ INSTAGRAM:
Nguồn: https://chothuevanphongsaigon.com/
Xem thêm bài viết khác: https://chothuevanphongsaigon.com/cong-nghe/
Xem thêm Bài Viết:
- Intel ra mắt Core i thế hệ 11 Tiến trình 10nm nâng cao hiệu năng, tích hợp nhân đồ họa Iris Xe
- Auto Cad là gì? Những ứng dụng của Auto Cad 2007
- Tổng hợp những công cụ hỗ trợ SEO tốt nhất hiện nay
- Hướng dẫn chi tiết cách sử dụng la bàn phong thủy trên điện thoại
- Top 3 phần mềm chuyển giọng nói thành văn bản tiếng Việt tốt nhất
No way the kitlens is so blurry. I own one for my a6000 (for street) besides a tamron 24-70 2.8 G2 for my full frame Nikons so I know where the diffenses are. This is not true.
The Model is the best one in the world.
backfocus on kit
the 16-50 need more post sharpening to look as good as 16-55….
For the price kit lens is excellent.
I would buy the new lense, but having at least one Wow like reaching to 70mm (to complement the 70350G), or starting at 14mm, or having OSS (to fit <a6500) would be great and I would buy immediately.
How do you do two indentical shots to compare lens?
My 16-50 was a lot better around 20-30 mm. The corners at 16 were poor like Arthur's copy, and mine was really more hazy above 35.
Got a used 16-70 after that. My 16-70 is worse at 25 mm, but that is side softness and not a general hazyness.
16-50 is not bad rather very close.
aw man that is some crispy footage
Hi
Thanks for the nice video
Im using Sony a6300 with kit lens and Sigma 16mm F1.4
Is Sony 16-55 2.8 G lens a good alternate ?
As a hobby I like landscape and travel photography, not much in to video
Appreciate if I can have some suggestions
Thanks
Shalika
Can this lens be balanced on a zhiyun weebill s?
the motion blur in this video is unnatural
I put it to you that if you viewed these photos at general normal print sizes of 6 x 4. or 10 x 8 you would not be able to tell the difference between them !!
your 16-50mm is a crap, my copy is very sharp, especially at 30mm f/5, but yours is very muddy at 30mm.
on left old wife on right young wife what you like? 😀
I like the softer look of the kitlens-pictures.
Thanks for this one, really useful. Any Chance of comparing the E 16-55mm F2.8 G SEL1655G Vs. E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS SEL18135
?
hello arthur, this lens and the newest sigma 24-70 f2.8 full frame lens are about the same price, should i just buy the sigma one?(a6400user now with kit lens)
16-55 f 2.8 vs 18-105 f4 Next Plss ^^
Do you think it's worth the upgrade for a Nex 5R with 16 megapixels?
I'm assuming against the 18-105 this is much sharper, but I wounder which makes the better travel/ walk around set up? Does having f2.8 and a bit more sharpness make up for the lack of range? Or are you better of taking the 18-105 and the sigma 16mm and covering all bases but just knowing you are going to have to swap out?
1400$… 2.8X1.5=4,2 real luminance.
Good job Arthur!
Does someone have the experience to use it with a6400? What quality of photos for the camera without stabilization? Or it is not a big problem for such focal length?
I wish glass wasn't so expensive. I can't compare this G lens to the kit lens, because the price just doesn't compare.
Do you have still that jacket wow 😀
The Sony 16-50 PS (Piece of Sh**) is well known for being really awful as a piece of… kit lens. Old, low quality, extra small and light.
I don't know if you did a comparison between it and a kit from Fuji (so sorry if you did it, will search for it).
Sony should replace this awful lens with something that would offer some decent quality, like the other APS-C manufacturers' (of mirrorless or DSLRs) lenses.
Would like to see a comparison with the Sony 18-105 F4!!
unmatched grade
Great review Arthur… thanks!
What's your opinion on the Sony FE 35mm f1.8? Can you make a video about it? Thank you!
@Arthur R : I like that you compared lens at the same settings (F5.0 vs F5.0) and best possible setting each lens has to offer (e.g. 40mm F2.8 vs 40mm F5.0) . In many of your previous videos, you would only compare lens using the same setting, and that didn't tell the whole story.
Please tr/review sigma 18-35 with newer body. Some says it has improved but you are the one who have tried it before with older body.
I'm excited for the upcoming sigma trio comparisons!
какая в жопу разница
I watch alot of your videos. those are very informative and very useful. Now I am thinking of buying a new Sony camera and lenses and I have 3 options in my mind but not sure which one will be the best bet. I will be taking mostly photo and a few videos. Please sugguest as I have a limited budget.
Option – 1
Sony A6400
Zeiss e16-70mm F4
Sigma 16mm F1.4
Option – 2
Sony A6600
Sigma 16mm f1.4
Sigma 56mm f1.4
Option – 3
Sony A6400
Sony e16-55mm f2.8